Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Andragogy, or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love Self-Directed Learning

It turned out to be quite apropos for me to learn about andragogy and adult learning theories this week. While I have been living in the world of pedagogy as a high school teacher, there seem to be more and more people who are working to develop solutions to our flawed educational system. Many of these possible solutions and hypotheses sound a lot like what I read this week about designing effective learning environments for adults.

Andragogy is the study of how adults learn. Since writing about it in 1968, Malcolm Knowles is seen as the foremost expert in the field. There has since been more research into how adults learn versus how children and teens learn. There appear to be many of aspects to this research that can apply to children as well.

Some key aspects of andragogy are that adults tend to feel the need to understand why they are learning something. Life experience has helped them develop a defined sense of self. Often, collaboration is an effective learning strategy for adult learners. Adult learners are often motivated by self-directed learning. Based upon where they are in life, they know what they want to learn, and often benefit from a self-directed learning approach. Below is a table explaining six key assumptions to andragogy put forth by Knowles:

Assumption Explanation
Learners' need to know Adults learn more effectively when they know why they are learning something. It can be useful to allow student input and reflection to help steer the course work.
Learners' self-concept Often adults have been trained to be dependent learners. Despite this, adults will resist if they feel another is imposing their will upon them. Technology tools can be useful for helping adults become more self-directed learners.
Role of learners' experience Adults' varied life experience will result in a more heterogeneous classroom. Adults will also appreciate their experience being recognized. Life experience can lead to certain biases. Opportunity for reflection is a useful tool to help adults confront and explore these biases.
Students' readiness to learn Adults will want to learn, or need to learn, when they see how learning can be relevant to real life situations. Whenever possible, a teacher should aim to create lessons and scenarios for learners that help them see the relevance to their goals and life.
Students' orientation to learning Lessons should be flexible. This will enable lessons to be developed that apply to students' life, are task and/or problem oriented. Real life examples are encouraged.
Students' motivation to learn Internal priorities weigh heavier to the adult learner than external motivation. Goal oriented assignments are effective, as is allowing student input into development of assignments.

When applying principles of andragogy to a classroom, whether online or face-to-face, a self-directed learning model can be useful. As noted above in our assumptions about andragogy, adult students are often self-motivated to learn because they have a desire to better handle certain real-life situations. This does not always translate to being self-directed. Just because an individual is motivated intrinsically to learn, does not mean that they know how to find their own path to learn. Once they are introduced to resources and learn more about how to learn effectively, adults can be eased into a more self-directed learning model.

Sharan B. Merriam did some intensive research into self-directed learning goals. The first goal of self-directed learning could be the development of how the students can be self-directed. As they learn more about themselves through the learning process, they can open up a larger capacity for self-directed learning. The second goal relates to transformational learning. Critical self-reflection is key to the adult learner growing and learning more about themselves and how they learn. The final goal involves emancipatory learning and social action. As adults learn more about their own learning, they can become agents for change in social and political spheres as they look to better themselves and the context of the world they live in.

Students of all ages (including adults) should be given the opportunity, through their education, to not just learn curriculum, but learn about themselves. People often spout that "you should learn something new everyday," but many people don't seem to understand how they learn. As an educator that should be the first goal before getting into curriculum and pedagogy or andragogy. Once the learner can better understand their capacity for change and learning, the other parts should fall more easily into place.





Bibliography

Fidishun, D. (no date, circa, 2005). Andragogy and technology: Integrating adult learning theory as we teach with technology, Malvern, PA: Penn State Great Valley School of Graduate Professional Studies.
Groleau, Daniel G. Andragogy in Action: Integrating Adult Learning Theory and Methods Into Training. N.p.: n.p., n.d. Print.
Manning, Gerri. “Self-Directed Learning: A Key Component of Adult Learning Theory.” Journal of the Washington Institute of China Studies 2.2 (2007): 104-15. Print.

Merriam, Sharon B. “Andragogy and Self-Directed Learning: Pillars of Adult Learning Theory.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education Spring 2001: 3-13. Print.

Wednesday, September 16, 2015

Learning Theories

It seems there are as many learning theories as there are students. This may be hyperbole, but because so many students learn in different ways, countless individuals have spent years trying to figure out how to best facilitate learning. I focused my research over the past couple of weeks on three learning theories:
  1. Pierre Dillenbourg and Daniel Schneider's work on Collaborative Learning and the Internet
  2. Greg Kearsley and Ben Shneiderman's Engagement Theory
  3. Jan Buffington's study of Learning Communities as an Instructional Model
Although they take different tacks, each theory emphasizes collaboration as an important element and explores how technology can be used within an educational framework. Since I completed my undergraduate study in education, I have seen the benefits of effective collaboration in action. I was excited to be able to do additional research on this topic and see what some experts have to say on the subject. Although collaboration plays a slightly different role within each of these theories, it serves an essential purpose in each one. Here will follow a look at some of the similarities and differences beyond collaboration within these theories including technology, role of conflict, types of tasks, curriculum, and applicability to the corporate world.

Each of these theories investigates how technology affects student learning. Dillenbourg and Schneider warn early in their work that every five years or so, people need to be reminded that technology will not, on its own, improve education. Collaboration can be effective without the aide of technology. With the advent of the internet and its ability to facilitate distance learning, a focus must be placed on studying new tools. Before educators jump in with both feet, they need to investigate which tools will actually facilitate effective collaboration via distance learning. Kearsley and Shneiderman see technology as a key tool in the quest for engagement of the learner. It has the ability to engage students in ways that may not have been available without. Buffington recognizes that Learning Communities need to meet regularly. Technology can be used to help that happen when parties cannot be physically in the same place.

One interesting aspect of Collaborative Learning and the Internet is how it sees conflict to be a key mechanism of collaborative learning. This does not mean fighting and arguing, but that learners who are having to process differing viewpoints than their own are more likely to grow and learn. The two other theories did not emphasize this idea. One of the conditions of learning found by Dillenbourg and Schneider is through rich tasks that cannot be performed alone. Engagement Theory also emphasizes the need for rich tasks in the form of project based materials. Buffington puts more focus on the type of environment needed to foster collaboration than on the types of tasks, but did see the need for learners to have some common ground or shared practice to work with.

Dillenbourg and Schneider do not mention much about whether or not tasks need to be curriculum based. A key component of Engagement Theory, however, is that the most engaging tasks are non-academic in focus. They should give students the opportunity to apply what they have learned outside the classroom. In the Learning Communities model, curriculum is driven by the learner. Students can drive what they learn, while the instructor acts as a facilitator. This also applies to corporate applications where the workers make more decisions about what there work should be rather than the managers. Engagement theory focuses more on classroom engagement. The principles found in Collaborative Learning and the Internet research could apply to both the classroom and the corporate world, as collaboration and the internet are prevalent in both areas.

Overall each of these learning theories have differences, but they all seem to point in similar directions. Students and workers learn more through collaboration. Technology can be a useful tool to foster that collaboration, especially in a distance learning environment. Students learn more when they are interacting and working with others. No man is an island.

View as PDF

Word Clouds created using Jason Davies Word Cloud Generator
Collaborative Learning and the Internet

Engagement Theory

Learning Communities as an Instructional Model


Bibliography:

Buffington, Jan. “Learning Communities as an Instructional Model.” Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology. Ed. Michael Orey. MediaWiki, n.d. Web. 15 Sept. 2015. <http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/index.php?title=Learning_Communities_as_an_Instructional_Model>.
Dillenbourg, Pierre, and Daniel Schneider. “Collaborative learning and the Internet.” ICCAI 95 article. CERN Webmaker, 8 Feb. 1995. Web. 15 Sept. 2015. <http://tecfa.unige.ch/tecfa/research/CMC/colla/iccai95_1.html>.
Ellis, Andrea M. “Active Engagement Theory.” N.d. Theories in Occupational, Technical, and Workforce Education. Web. 15 Sept. 2015. <http://ocedtheories.wikispaces.com/file/view/EngagementTheory_AndreaEllis_PDF.pdf>.

Odom, D. “Engagement Theory.” The Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Ed. Bob Hoffman. San Diego State University Department of Educational Technology, 6 Dec. 2010. Web. 16 Sept. 2015. <http://eet.sdsu.edu/eetwiki/index.php/Engagement_theory>.